1) My own life as a starting point and the ultimate end The most important thing for life studies is that one’s own life should be both the beginning and the end of life studies. In life studies we should never detach ourselves from the problems and think ourselves as exceptions. Knowledge or discussion completely separated from one’s own life should not be included in life studies. Mere analysis of ethical concepts or social structure cannot constitute life studies. Instead, for example, a private narrative of my own experiences is a good starting point for life studies analysis of human psychology and ethics. I performed this process in the book How to Live in a Post-religious Age and Painless Civilization. Life studies comes close to literature in this sense. Subjective knowledge is as important as objective knowledge in life studies. We need to explore the ways to share subjective knowledge among us. 2) Pursuit of "life without regret" The pursuit of life without regret is the ultimate end of life studies. In life studies, all intellectual activities, for example, reading, research, analysis, contemplation, discussion and writing, are concentrated and integrated to this end. We should be aware of the fact that our life in this world is limited. We are all going to die sooner or later. Hnece, as mentioned above, life studies should be an attempt to acquire an interdisciplinary, organized knowledge, intellect, and wisdom that help us live our limited lives without regret. In the book Painless Civilization I presented the idea of "the central axis" existing on the basis of ourselves, by following which we are able to live our lives without regret. 3) Confrontation with our own desire and evil Life studies encourages us to keep our eyes on our own "desire" and "evil" that are deeply engraved into our heart. We cannot entirely escape from our own desire and evil. What is needed is not to unconditionally accept them, but to forgive us who cannot escape from them, and to seek ways to continuously try to overcome our tendency to return to them. We have to explore wisdom and social system to support that attempt. Moral imperatives alone cannot change our fundamental attitudes. In the book Painless Civilization I presented the possibility of transforming "the desire of the body" into "the desire of life." And in the book Life Studies Approaches to Bioethics I presented the idea of "retroactive method from evil." 4) Critique of contemporary society, civilization, and scientific technology A search for the meaning of life usually tends to aim at personal healing and self-realization, but we should go forward to the next important step, the critique of contemporary society, civilization, and scientific technology, because contemporary civilization cleverly takes away from us the meaning of life and the possibility of living a life without regret (See Painless Civilization). This critique should lead to the reconsideration of the existing scientific methodology and social systems. We should make clear what kind of society is preferable in order for all of us to be able to fully pursue lives without regret, and how we can create its social system. A transformation of the self without changing society is not the goal of life studies. 5) Inquiry into the world of life All life on the earth are closely connected with one another. Humans are no exception. We cannot live without killing and eating other creatures. Our live is supported by fresh air, water, crops, and domesticated animals. One of the most important features of life studies is to think about the meaning of human life in relationship with other creatures on the earth, and with nature — the matrix of life. After we die, our bodies return to the earth and the air, that is to say, all parts of our bodies spread back to the matrix of life, hence, the meaning of human life and death should also be considered from the viewpoint of our relationship with nature and the environment. Many creatures on the earth, including humans, share a lot of genes and the process of evolution, hence, our lives without regret cannot be separated from our relationships with other creatures and the natural environment. (See Concept of Inochi(life), and Life Torn Apart). 6) The third way between religion and science Life studies deals with the journey of our irreplaceable life, which cannot be scientifically replicated, because we cannot live any moment of our life twice. At the same time, life studies says nothing about God, the transcendent being, and the afterlife, because we can’t have certain knowledge about them. Life studies does not deny science or religion. Life studies simply follows a different path from science and religion. Life studies seeks post-religious spirituality of life, death, and nature, without using the language of religion. We help promote dialogue between life studies and religion, that is, religious approaches to life studies, and life studies approaches to religion. 7) Practices of life studies There are three interrelated approaches in the practices of life studies. a) Systematic approach: Collaborative research aiming at interdisciplinary knowledge and wisdom for life without regret. b) Dialogue approach: Examination of existing disciplines from the viewpoint of life studies, and discussion between life studies and these disciplines. c) Personal approach: A personal practice of examining one’s own life for solving one’s own private problems by using life studies concepts and methods. 1) Painless civilization The endless tendency in our civilization to eliminate pain and suffering makes us totally lose sight of the meaning of life that is indispensable to human beings. I called this "painless civilization" in the book Painless Civilization. >> See section 3. 2) Fundamental sense of security In the book Life Studies Approaches to Bioethics I presented the idea of "the fundamental sense of security" as a key concept for future life studies.This is "a sense of security with which I can strongly believe that even if I were less intelligent, ugly, or disabled, at least my existence would have been accepted equally to the world, and if I should succeed, fail, or become a doddering old man, my existence will continue to be accepted equally to the world. This is the basis of our life upon which we keep sane in this society" (cited from the book, and this paper). I believe that this is a really important concept in the coming age of new eugenics. 3) The central axis This concept was introduced in the book Painless Civilization. There are three layers in personal identity, namely, surface identity, deep identity, and the central axis. The central axis is the most basic one, but in everyday life many people forget the layer of the central axis. The central axis is a path by following which I will be able to say, when I die, that I am happy to have been born. One’s central axis can be found by dismantling his/her deep identity. This concept is closely connected with that of "life without regret." 4) The desire of the body and the desire of life In the book Painless Civilization I distinguished two sorts of desires, namely, "the desire of the body" and "the desire of life." While the desire of the body seeks to protect pleasure, pleasantness, and vested interests, the desire of life tries to discard them, dismantle the current self, and open oneself to an unexpected future. It is our "desire of the body" that promotes "painless civilization." This desire of the body takes away from us the deep "joy of life" that could visit us in an unexpected way when we transform ourselves by going through pain and suffering. 5) Reality of swaying I When we encounter a situation we have never wanted to experience, especially that of profound self-contradiction, we are emotionally swayed by it, and wish to avert our eyes from the situation. Japanese feminist, Mitsu Tanaka, called this kind of experience "the sway of the confused self." But paradoxically, only people in this swaying situation can truly understand the deep suffering of others and enter into the relationship of mutual support. "The reality of swaying I" is the concept introduced in the book Life Studies Approaches to Bioethics in order to enlarge Tanaka’s idea. "The reality of swaying I" is closely connected to "the advent of an absent being." 6) Relationship and irreplaceability All beings in the universe, especially all living things on the earth, are incorporated into the web of “relationships.” They can not exist without these relationships. At the same time, every being in these relationships is fundamentally “irreplaceable” to each other. Life studies urges us to view everything from the perspective of correlation between "relationship" and "irreplaceability." (see Concept of Inochi(life).) 7) Three natures of human life In the series of essays Life Torn Apart, I insisted that three natures are deeply engraved on humans, namely, "the nature of connectedness (with all living things)," "the nature of self-interest," and "the nature of mutual support." These natures sometimes keep in harmony, but sometimes come into conflict with each other. I believe that it is important to see the relationship between humans and the world of living creatures from this perspective. and more… Research Programs I would like to propose the following research projects. 1) Philosophy of life Philosophy of life includes clarification of problems such as "What is life without regret?" and "Why must we live while we all die in the end?" >> See section 2 2) Critique of contemporary civilization Life studies should include a fundamental reconsideration of our society that is driven by capitalism, materialism, and scientific technology. The question is whether people can live a life without regret in contemporary society where they are obsessed with pleasure and pleasantness. >> See section 3 3) Research on images of life One of the most important researches in life studies is the study of images of life, death and nature ordinary people actually have in different areas of the world. It would be of great help to researchers in life studies if they could know what imaginations and ideas people have in contemporary society. My paper, "The Concept of Inochi(life)," shows a result of preliminary research among Japanese. This research is still going on. Comparative research among countries will be needed. 4) Criticism of bioethics Criticism of "bioethics" is needed because it often lacks an insight into the meaning of life, and it also lacks a critical view of the essence of contemporary civilization that has created bioethical problems. Though bioethics research is expanding around the world, it’s time to renovate it by introducing the viewpoint of life studies. I tried this in my book, Life Studies Approaches to Bioethics (2001), and other papers; some of them (1 2) were written in English. And it is important to connect bioethics to "environmental ethics" because our attitudes toward life are closely connected with our attitudes toward nature, the environment. I wrote a series of papers in Japanese. 5) Research on human nature and social factors that interfere with our attempt to change We seek to live a good life and create a good society, but we have almost always failed. I suspect there might be human nature and/or social factors that interfere with our attempt to change our society and ourselves. I propose to research these interfering factors from the viewpoints of various disciplines including biology, psychology, history, and social sciences. This will be a totally interdisciplinary approach. This is our future research. 6) Research on the fate of social reform movements This research has a close connection to the above one. We have had various social reform movements up until the present, for example, Marxism, totalitarianism, American capitalism, various religious communities, etc., but there were few movements that succeeded in creating a sustainable community where severe oppression against minorities could not be found. We have to know the end results of their movements, in order to think seriously about the limitation of "life studies." Future research. 7) Criticque of science from the viewpint of life studies The aim of science, especially natural science, is to increase objective knowledge. However, as science progresses, a set of questions that science has avoided asking are starting to emerge before us as unavoidable questions, such as the question of "the meaning of life", the methodology of handling "qualitative data", the interpretation of the inner emotions or values of the other persons, and so forth. We need a new method to handle this kind of "subjective knowledge," and by using this method we will be able to share important experiences and wisdom. As a first step to attain this goal, I propose to criticize science from this perspective, and go on to the second step, the creation of a new methodology for dealing with subjective knowledge. Future research.
An untouchable area in human life In the near future various advanced technologies are expected to invade the human body, the DNA, and the brain. It may be time to set up an untouchable area in human life where technological interventions will have to be prohibited. It is required to protect the untouchable area from our own desire. 9) Life studies approaches to various disciplines I think it is an interesting idea to introduce some basic ideas of life studies to various disciplines or movements, such as psychology, nursing, sociology, religion, ethics, cultural studies, and so on. Life studies would probably be able to stimulate those disciplines, and as a result, fruitful dialogues might occur. I tried this in the book, Life Studies Approaches to Bioethics (2001), and criticized the framework of contemporary bioethics from the viewpoint of life studies. I am thinking of a similar approach to ecology. Many other approaches will be possible. 10) Connection of academic research to researcher’s own life The most important thing for life studies is that a researcher hem/herself can live his/her own life without regret. In this sense, academic research that will not help transform the researcher’s own life should not be called "life studies." Life studies encourages a researcher to rethink his/her actual life and transform it, and after that, express that painful process in some form in order share it among us. Morioka expressed the process in the book Painless Civilization (2003). This process should lead to the transformation of the social system and our intellect.